7325
95【聊了什么】
同样讨论总统罢免权，FTC 不是例外，美联储却是；同样声称尊重文本和原意，保守派大法官在出生公民权、投票权和跨性别权益案中，却一次次更换自己的法理工具。
本期我们与 Nancy、品达一起盘点美国最高法院 2025-2026 开庭期：特朗普的“单一行政权”走到了哪一步？谁仍然被视为美国人？《投票权法》还剩下多少效力？跨性别学生为什么被排除在女子校队之外？当法院的判决越来越只能用政治解释，偶尔对特朗普说“不”，究竟是制度制衡，还是“小骂大帮忙”？
【支持我们】
如果喜欢这期节目并希望支持我们将节目继续做下去：
也欢迎加入我们的会员计划： theamericanroulette.com
会员可以收到每周2-5封newsletter，可以加入会员社群，参加会员活动，并享受更多福利。
合作投稿邮箱：american.roulette.pod@gmail.com
【时间轴】
01:39 FTC 与美联储：特朗普能解雇谁
08:02 “单一行政权”如何成为保守派共识
28:29 出生公民权与谁算“美国人”
43:31 TPS 终止：移民身份和司法审查
53:35 投票权法、黑人选区与政治划区
1:02:02 最高法院还有稳定法理吗
1:13:01 跨性别学生参加女子体育案
1:20:53 校园体育为什么不能套用精英体育逻辑
1:33:32 Alito 退休乌龙与大法官的个人政治
1:41:21 Barrett 为什么总成为右翼攻击目标
1:44:36 法院改革与对特朗普“小骂大帮忙”
【我们是谁】
美轮美换是一档深入探讨当今美国政治的中文播客。
本期的主播和嘉宾：
Lokin：美国法学院毕业生，即将成为一名纽约诉讼律师
王浩岚：美国政治爱好者，岚目公众号主笔兼消息二道贩子
Nancy：普林斯顿大学政治学博士生，耶鲁法学院法律博士
品达：美国政治观察人士，《孤岛繁星》主播
【 What We Talked About】
When considering the same question of presidential removal power, the Court decided that the FTC was not an exception, but the Federal Reserve was. And while the conservative justices continue to profess their commitment to textualism and originalism, they repeatedly switched doctrinal tools in cases involving birthright citizenship, voting rights, and transgender rights.
In this episode, Nancy and Pinda join us to review the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2025-2026 term. How far has Trump’s vision of the “unitary executive” advanced? Who still counts as American? How much remains of the Voting Rights Act? Why can transgender students be excluded from girls’ school sports? As the Court’s decisions become increasingly difficult to explain through legal doctrine alone, do its occasional rulings against Trump represent genuine institutional checks, or merely “small rebukes, big assists”?
【Support Us】
If you like our show and want to support us, please consider the following:
Join our membership program: theamericanroulette.com
Support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/americanroulette
Business Inquiries and fan mail: american.roulette.pod@gmail.com
【Timeline】
01:39 The FTC and the Federal Reserve: Whom can Trump fire?
08:02 How the “unitary executive” became a conservative consensus
28:29 Birthright citizenship and who counts as “American”
43:31 Ending TPS: Immigration status and judicial review
53:35 The Voting Rights Act, majority-Black districts, and partisan redistricting
1:02:02 Does the Supreme Court still have a coherent legal doctrine?
1:13:01 The case over transgender students participating in girls’ sports
1:20:53 Why school sports cannot be judged by the logic of elite athletics
1:33:32 The false report of Alito’s retirement and the personal politics of the justices
1:41:21 Why Barrett remains a favorite target of the right
1:44:36 Court reform and the Supreme Court’s “small rebukes, big assists” approach to Trump
【Who We Are】
The American Roulette is a podcast dedicated to helping the Chinese-speaking community understand fast-changing U.S. politics.
Our Hosts and Guests:
Lokin: U.S. law school student, incoming NY litigation lawyer
王浩岚 (Haolan Wang): American political enthusiast, chief writer at Lán Mù WeChat Official Account, and peddler of information
Nancy：Princeton Politics PhD student, Yale Law School graduate
Pinda：American political enthusiast
【The Links】
IMO with Michelle Obama and Craig Robinson：Ketanji Brown Jackson 访谈
Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)：推翻 Chevron deference
